Naval Strategy in Northeast Asia by Duk-Ki Kim

Author:Duk-Ki Kim [Kim, Duk-Ki]
Language: eng
Format: epub
Tags: History, Military, General, Political Science, Security (National & International)
ISBN: 9781136326431
Google: _Z9qn65axHUC
Publisher: Routledge
Published: 2012-10-12T04:57:29+00:00

NOTES

1. Admiral Sergei G. Gorshkov, Red Star Basing at Sea, ed. Herbert Preston (Annapolis, MD: US Naval Institute Press, 1974), p. 141.

2. Quote in US, Office of Naval Intelligence, Worldwide Submarine Challenge (Washington, DC: ONI, 1997), p. 9.

3. Rear Admiral Valery Aleksin, ‘Russia needs a Strong Navy’, US Naval Institute Proceedings, vol. 123, no. 12 (December 1997), p. 47.

4. Gerald Segal, ‘Russia as an Asia-Pacific Power’, in Ramesh Thakur and Carlyle A. Thayer (eds), Reshaping Regional Relations: Asia-Pacific and the Former Soviet Union (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993), pp. 70–8.

5. For the text of the speech, see Text of Speech by Mikhail Gorbachev in Vladivostok, 28 July 1986 in Ramesh Thakur and Caryle A. Thayer (eds), The Soviet Union as An Asia-Pacific Power (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1987), pp. 201–27.

6. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Druzhba is part of Kazakhstan.

7. Yeltsin's visit to Japan was planned to be an occasion not only for a resolution of territorial dispute, but for a statement of wider Asia-Pacific policy, of the kind associated with Gorbachev. The Russian Far East consists of four large administrative bodies: (1) Primorsky and Khabarovsk Territories (Krai); (2) Amur, Magadan, Kamchatka and Sakhalin Regions (Oblasti); (3) the Jewish Autonomous Region, the Chukchi and Koryak Autonomous Districts (Raiony); and (4) the Republic of Sakha (Yakutiya). The word Sakha is the name of the principal Yakut ethnic group. For further information on this point, see Versa Tolz, ‘Regionalism in Russia: The Case of Siberia’, RFE/RL Research Report, vol. 2, no. 9 (February 1993), p. 3; Supar Report, vol. 1, no. 10 (January 1991), p. 203; and Supar Report, vol. 1, no. 11 (July 1991), p. 122; and Segeri Manezhev, The Russian Far East (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs [hereafter RIIA], 1993), pp. 9–10.

8. Quoted in Paul D. Wolfwiz, The US–Russian Strategic Partnership’, in Stephen Sestanovich (ed.), Rethinking Russia's National Interests (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies [hereafter CSIS], 1994), p. 64.

9. For more comprehensive analysis of this charter, see Wolfwiz, ‘The US–Russian Strategic Partnership’, pp. 64–7. According to US Intelligence officials, Washington believed that a nuclear war with Washington appeared to remain a high Russian priority. In particular, the US Department of Defense official said that the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy did not co-operate with the American efforts to help build a new fissile material store at Mayak in western Russia and Tomsk in southern Russia. For a useful and manageable description of this point, see Daniel Yergin and Thane Gustafson, Russia 2010, 2nd edn (London: Nicholas Brealey, 1994), pp. 294–5 and ‘Pentagon advising on Personal Screening’, Jane's Defence Weekly [hereafter JDW], 16 December 1995, p. 5.

10. Quoted in Vyacheslav N. Bunin, ‘Russia's National Interest in Northeast Asia: Building a Collective Security Mechanism in Northeast Asia: The In-Region and Russian Perspectives’, for The First Northeast Asia Defence Forum by the Korean Institute of Defense Analysis [hereafter KIDA] and the Research Institute for Peace and Security [hereafter RIPS], held in Seoul, 2–3 November 1993, p. 10.

11.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.